|
 |

Ambiophonics,
2nd Edition
Replacing Stereophonics to Achieve
Concert-Hall Realism
By Ralph Glasgal, Founder
Ambiophonics Institute, Rockleigh, New Jersey www.ambiophonics.org
Chapter 2
Concert-Hall Sound Characteristics
In order to recreate a realistic concert-hall or opera-house sound
field at home, it is necessary to know what makes a great music
auditorium sound the way it does. Literally hundreds of papers and books
have been written on this subject, and while physical concert hall design
is now largely based on computer simulation and known acoustic
principles, there is still a lot of subjective opinion and art involved.
This is also the case in creating a domestic concert hall or a domestic
home movie theater. Again the Ambiophonic principles discussed
below can be applied to electronic music, games, virtual reality, video,
etc.
Concert-hall listeners, not too far back in the auditorium, can usually
detect left-to-right angular position of musicians on the stage, can
sense depth or the distance they are from the performer, can sense height
if say a chorus is elevated on risers, can sense the size of the space
they are sitting in, and sense its liveness. Some people can also sense
where they are in such a space and what is behind them. When listening to
recorded music at home, we want our system to provide us with the same
sonic clues that the concert hall provides to its patrons present in the
hall during a performance.
In this chapter we explore what makes a hall sound both real and good, so
that we can determine which features of a hall we must absolutely
duplicate at home in order to fool our ears into thinking that we are in
a concert-hall space that is palpably real. We also need to know enough
about hall parameters so that we can optimize the ambience controls of
our domestic concert just as we do our stereo volume, balance, tone
controls, etc.
Concert-hall
listeners, not too far back in the auditorium, usually can detect
left-to-right angular position of musicians on the stage, can sense
depth or the distance they are from the performer, can sense height
if say a chorus is elevated on risers, can sense the size of the space
they are sitting in, and sense its liveness. Some people can also
sense where they are in such a space and what is behind them. When
listening to recorded music at home, we want our system to provide
us with the same sonic clues that the concert hall provides to its
patrons present in the hall during a performance.
In this chapter we explore what makes a hall
sound both real and good, so that we can determine which features of a hall we must
absolutely duplicate at home in order to fool our ears into thinking that we are in a
concert-hall space that is palpably real. We also need to know enough about hall
parameters so that we can optimize the ambience controls of our domestic concert just as
we do our stereo volume, balance, tone controls, etc.
Direct Sound and
Proscenium Reflections
First, for a listener in the
audience, there must be an unobstructed path for direct sound to travel
from the stage to the listener's ears. This direct sound is then followed
by early reflections from the back wall of the stage, the side walls of
the stage, the ceiling and, to a lesser extent, the floor of the stage.
These first or early reflections come at the listener from roughly the
same quadrasphere as the direct sound, i.e., the front 150 degrees or so.
Depending on the depth, width, and height of the stage, and its sound
reflectivity, these early proscenium reflections arrive from 10 to 300
milliseconds after the direct sound and are fairly strong.
Sound-Signal Correlation
At this point we must introduce the concept of sound correlation. A
piece of music, on paper, such as an organ fugue, has a correlation value
that represents how the present sound relates to the previously heard
sound. The extent of this self or internal structural correlation, called
autocorrelation, depends only on the score and the length of time over
which correlation is looked for. The intrinsic autocorrelation value of
the music, when it is performed, will be then also be modified by the
amplitude, delay, angle of incidence and number of reflections
experienced. Correlation factors go from 0 to 1 where 1 means the next
sound is completely predictable and 0 means there is absolutely no
relationship between one note or transient and the next or even no
relationship between the beginning of a note and the end of it.
We are also very concerned with the correlation between the sounds
reaching the right and left ears. This correlation factor is called
Interaural Cross Correlation (IACC). The existence of IACCs less than 1
makes stereophonic and binaural perception possible. Thus, there are
autocorrelation factors that describe the signals impinging on a single
ear and there are the interaural cross-correlation factors that describe
the sound differences between the ears.
An example of simple autocorrelation properties is the round "Row,
Row, Row Your Boat as sung by two voices outdoors. If we look at the
sound over just the short period of time it takes one voice to sing
"Row, Row," and the other voice to sing "Merrily,
Merrily," the voices will appear to be entirely uncorrelated. But if
we look at the relationship over a period of minutes, we would discover a
higher value of autocorrelation since each voice eventually sings exactly
what the other voice has just sung. If one voice is a tenor and one a
soprano, this correlation is weakened, and if the tenor sings out of
tune, softly, in French, and is indoors in the next room, the correlation
factor begins to approach zero. Most people would prefer to hear such a
performance with an autocorrelation factor higher than zero but still
much less than 1. A "1" would imply that the tenor and soprano
where singing precisely the same notes and words at the same time, in the
same room milieu, and in the same vocal range.
Autocorrelation and Musical Sounds
Different types of music have different autocorrelation values when
looked at through a window of three seconds or longer. For example, an
organ playing in a cathedral will have a significantly larger value than
a solo guitar playing outdoors. The reason all this is pertinent to
concert-hall sound is that the autocorrelation value of music determines
the type of ambient field that will make it sound best. Thus a concert
hall may be well designed for orchestral music but be a horror for a
string quartet. The advantage of the home concert hall is that, unlike
the real hall, we can, if we wish, adjust our home hall to suit the
autocorrelation value of each musical selection.
Significance of the Hall IACC
While hall reverberation characteristics are the key factor in coping
with autocorrelation problems, it is really the interaural
cross-correlation value particularly of the early reflected sounds that
largely determines the quality of a concert hall and provides the best
aural clues to hall presence. In the concert-hall ambience world, the
IACC value largely represents what happens in the milliseconds after the
arrival of a direct sound sample. Hall design research has shown that the
IACC should be kept as small as possible (greatest signal difference
between the ears for as long as possible) for the most pleasing
concert-hall sound. This should come as no surprise to audiophiles who
have always believed in maintaining as much left-right signal separation
as possible.
To quote Professor Yoichi Ando, (Concert Hall Acoustics, Springer Verlag,
1945), "The IACC depends mainly on the directions from which the
early reflections arrive at the listener and on their amplitude. IACC
measurements show a minimum at a sound source angle of 55 degrees to the
median plane." To translate this, the average person's ears and head
are so constructed that a sound coming from 55 degrees to the right of
the nose, impinging on the right ear, will not produce a very good
replica of itself at the left ear due to time delay, frequency distortion
and sound attenuation caused by the ear pinna shape and head obstruction.
The IACC value for this condition is typically .36, which is a remarkably
good separation for such a situation.
Ando points out that 90 degrees is not better because the almost
identical paths around the head (front and back) double the leakage and,
therefore, do not decrease the IACC effectively, particularly for
frequencies higher than 500Hz.
By contrast, if an early reflection or any sound arrives from straight
ahead, the IACC equals one since both ears hear almost exactly the same
sound at the same time, and this is desirable for the direct sound from
sources directly in front of the listener. That is, the direct frontal
sounds should be more correlated than any reflective signals that follow
in the first 100 milliseconds or so. As reflections bounce around the
hall, the IACC of the reverberant field increases. The rate at which this
inter-ear similarity increases determines how good a concert hall sounds
when a piece of music with a particular autocorrelation value is being
performed. That is why a pipe organ sounds better in a church than in a
disco.
The lesson to be learned from all this correlation stuff is that early
reflections in the home listening room should have as much left-right
signal separation as the recording or ambience processing allows and that
many early reflections (but not later reverberant tails) should come from
the region around 55 degrees.
More on Early Reflections
Some front proscenium reflections in the concert hall come from
above. However, such vertical reflections strike the pinna of both ears
from pretty much the same angle with the same amplitude and at the same
time. Thus these reflections are highly correlated at the ears and,
therefore have little effect in adding to the spatial interest of a
concert hall. In our discussions of domestic concert halls, we will,
therefore, assume that early reflections from above are of lesser
importance or can be safely ignored and indeed, experiments with raising
front reflection speakers overhead show this to be optional.
To quote Ando again on early reflections: "The time delay between
the first and second early reflections should be 0.8 of the delay between
the direct sound and the first reflection." That is, later
reflections should be closer together. "If the first reflection is
of the same amplitude and frequency response as the direct sound, then
the preferred initial time delay is found to be identical to the time
delay at which the envelope of the autocorrelation function (coherence of
the direct sound) decays to a value of 0.1 of its initial
value." Ando found that first reflection delays of from 30 to
130 ms. were preferred, with the exact listener preference proportional
to the duration of the autocorrelation function or the average or the
average time over which the music is related to itself most strongly.
That is, listeners prefer later initial reflections for organ music or a
Brahms symphony and earlier ones for a Mozart violin sonata. Such a
preference is perhaps intuitively obvious: for most organ music, if the
first reflection arrived too soon, it would be ineffective, since the
same direct note would probably still be sounding. We will make use of
these rules of thumb when it comes time to set the early-reflection
parameters for a given recording in our reconstituted concert
hall.
We can all agree that different types of music sound best in different
types of halls. For instance, symphony orchestras usually sound good in
concert halls, string quartets sound better in salons or recital halls,
and organs are more at home in churches or cathedrals. While one could
use room treatment, panes, etc. to construct a home listening room that
could very accurately mimic Carnegie Hall, this room would not be
appropriate for a listener whose record collection also includes jazz,
opera, madrigals, lieder and solo piano. Any home music theater must be
capable of adapting quickly to each type of music being played.
Fortunately the convolution technique described in later chapters makes
this possible if one knows how halls work so that one can then operate
the convolver intelligently.
Reverberation
After the frontal early reflections come the rear, ceiling, and
rearward side reflections and reflections of these reflections from the
proscenium and all the other hall surfaces. Once these reflections are so
close together that the ear or even measuring instruments cannot
distinguish them they are called collectively "reverberation"
and form a reverberant field. The reverberant field has many parameters
that concert hall designers tinker with and that we will be able to
season to taste at home. They are the sound level at the onset of the
reverberant field, its density, its frequency response and such response
changes with time, its angles of incidence, its diffuseness (i.e., its
directionality versus intensity), its rate of decay, and its interaural
cross correlation. Combinations of these reverberant train parameters
allow a listener to perceive the liveness and, to some extent, with the
help of the early reflections, the volume of the structure.
The reverberation preferences of concert-goers are again dependent on
program material. Chamber music, jazz combos and string symphonies
usually sound better with shorter reverberation times. (For the record,
the official definition of reverberation time is the time it takes for
the sound pressure of a single impulse to fall by 60 dB or to
one-millionth of its initial strength.) Large choral works and organ
recitals usually benefit from longer reverberation times, with opera
stagings somewhere in between. In numerical terms, reverberation times
range from over 3 seconds for cathedrals to 1 to 2 seconds for opera
houses and concert halls to .5 to 1 second for recital halls or bars.
Since the home listener may perhaps have a wide-ranging music or video
collection, we must take care to see that the home concert hall can be
quickly optimized for the specific recording being played.
Depth Perception
The ears' ability to detect distance is not as good as that of the
eyes'. Depth localization depends on large values of the interaural level
difference for nearby sources and for more distant sounds on a hazy
feeling for absolute loudness, timbre differences with distance (such as
high frequency roll-off), time-of-arrival differences between direct and
reflected sound and, if indoors, the ratio of direct to reflected sound.
The first four of these factors are easily captured on recordings
directly by microphones or can be manipulated by recording engineers,
using delay compensation for spot microphones. Since Ambiophonic playback
recovers more ILD than the stereo triangle, depth perception is
enhanced. The use of surround speakers producing concert-hall
ambience also enhances the feeling of depth.
The fourth depth localization factor is sometimes difficult to preserve
directly on a disc. If a recording is made outdoors or with
microphones that do not pick up many reflections or much hall reverb,
then any ambience added later during reproduction will affect all sound
source positions equally. For example, increasing the level of the
reverberant field makes the listener feel he is further back in the
auditorium rather than increasing the distance between the front and rear
instruments.
However, as a practical matter, I do not sense any loss of depth
perception in my own domestic concert hall. This may be because most
recordings are not dry enough to make the effect audible. But more
likely, in the average live concert hall, the stage and its shell are so
reflective that the direct sound of all instruments, whether located at
the front or the back, has about the same ratio of direct-to-reflected
sound. This front-to-back stage depth, as opposed to average distance to
the stage, particularly for a balcony listener, is not easy to perceive
in the typical hall. Also, in some recordings, multiple spot microphones
are placed so close to their sound sources that almost no difference in
the ratio of direct-to-reflected sound of any instrument is actually
recorded. To compensate for this, ambience pickup is then relegated to
other remotely placed microphones, so again all instruments recede
together. In the home reproduction system, as in the concert hall, it is
unlikely that any lack of differential depth perception will actually
disturb the illusion of being there. |
 |
|